<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Art or Exploitation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/</link>
	<description>An Aussie mum raising 5 kids...&#38; 1 husband</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: photodestroyer.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bill Henson: The #2 Topic on Blogs for the week..</title>
		<link>http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/comment-page-1/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>photodestroyer.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bill Henson: The #2 Topic on Blogs for the week..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/?p=296#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>[...] Sourced from: http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFFF95; padding: 1em; padding-left: 20px ">
<p>[...] Sourced from: <a href="http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/" rel="nofollow">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/</a> [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Henson: The #2 Topic on Blogs for the week..</title>
		<link>http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/comment-page-1/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Henson: The #2 Topic on Blogs for the week..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/?p=296#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>[...] Sourced from: http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFFF95; padding: 1em; padding-left: 20px ">
<p>[...] Sourced from: <a href="http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/" rel="nofollow">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/</a> [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tazia</title>
		<link>http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Tazia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/?p=296#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s art for rich pedophiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s art for rich pedophiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 20:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/?p=296#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe a gallery actually let him put pictures like that up! Wow! 

I completely disagree with the censorship thing. This is just wrong children could easily see this and think that it&#039;s okay for someone to take naked pictures of them. 

It&#039;s just not right.

Hollys last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AbcsofFineDesign/~3/297280034/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A trip though time and art&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe a gallery actually let him put pictures like that up! Wow! </p>
<p>I completely disagree with the censorship thing. This is just wrong children could easily see this and think that it&#8217;s okay for someone to take naked pictures of them. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just not right.</p>
<p>Hollys last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AbcsofFineDesign/~3/297280034/" rel="nofollow">A trip though time and art</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/?p=296#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>Interesting topic... How many people take pics of their naked kids doing silly stuff though?  What if you show the pictures on a slideshow to your friends? Does audience have an effect on how the pictures are percieved? What exactly upsets people about naked children? Is it the manner in which they are posed? If it&#039;s dark and serious does that make it worse than if it&#039;s happy, light and bubbly? Is it the issue of consent? That would probably be an issue with me. If a child cannot legally give consent, then that means the parents give it and who knows if the parents forced their children to do this kind of thing, which could have long lasting psychological effects. Even if the children wanted to have their pictures taken in the nude, does that mean it&#039;s okay? I would venture to say no. And I sort of agree with your pedophile comment, although I think that looking at just about any pictures of children would be a pedophile&#039;s fantasy. It just makes me wonder where the line should be drawn I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting topic&#8230; How many people take pics of their naked kids doing silly stuff though?  What if you show the pictures on a slideshow to your friends? Does audience have an effect on how the pictures are percieved? What exactly upsets people about naked children? Is it the manner in which they are posed? If it&#8217;s dark and serious does that make it worse than if it&#8217;s happy, light and bubbly? Is it the issue of consent? That would probably be an issue with me. If a child cannot legally give consent, then that means the parents give it and who knows if the parents forced their children to do this kind of thing, which could have long lasting psychological effects. Even if the children wanted to have their pictures taken in the nude, does that mean it&#8217;s okay? I would venture to say no. And I sort of agree with your pedophile comment, although I think that looking at just about any pictures of children would be a pedophile&#8217;s fantasy. It just makes me wonder where the line should be drawn I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hello.com.au &#187; The blogosphere reacts to Bill Henson</title>
		<link>http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/2008/05/23/art-or-exploitation/comment-page-1/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>hello.com.au &#187; The blogosphere reacts to Bill Henson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 02:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mummifiedtimesfive.net/?p=296#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>[...] blog reading&#8230;The Bill Henson controversy, Behind the News, Art or Exploitation?, OUTRAGE: Bill Henson’s Exhibition. Child porn?, Art and censorship – not a good mix, About [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFFF95; padding: 1em; padding-left: 20px ">
<p>[...] blog reading&#8230;The Bill Henson controversy, Behind the News, Art or Exploitation?, OUTRAGE: Bill Henson’s Exhibition. Child porn?, Art and censorship – not a good mix, About [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.394 seconds -->
